Article 8076 of alt.sys.pdp10: From: westin*nospam@graphics.cornell.edu (Stephen H. Westin) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp8,alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: ooh, a *real* flamewar :) Date: 12 Apr 2000 13:09:01 -0400 Organization: Cornell University Program of Computer Graphics Lines: 33 Sender: westin@DIESEL Message-ID: References: <8ce1l9$3q7$1@news.enteract.com> <8cfkp5$fp0$1@new-news.cc.brandeis.edu> <8d289v$8s$1@agate.berkeley.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: diesel.graphics.cornell.edu X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 Path: news3.best.com!news2.best.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.syr.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.graphics.cornell.edu!news Xref: news3.best.com alt.sys.pdp8:5257 alt.sys.pdp10:8076 alt.folklore.computers:154983 korpela@islay.ssl.berkeley.edu (Eric J. Korpela) writes: > In article , > Eric Smith wrote: > >I'm not aware of how Sun solved this problem on their 68000-based machines; > > Did Sun have 68000-based machines? I thought that the first Sun I > used (one of those old ugly Sun 1 systems (weren't they actually > called the Sun 100 at the time?)) was 68010 based. It certainly had > /bin/mc68010 linked to /bin/true. There were SUN machines before there was a company called Sun. SUN stands for "Stanford University Network". As I understand it, there was a major effort to build lots of 68000-based workstations with bitmap displays, connected by a campus-wide Ethernet (which had just been souped up from 2MB/sec to 10MB/sec). This was all fit into a MULTIBUS backplane. There were a couple of manufacturers of the SUN/1 processor board, which included some quantity of on-board memory. I don't know if these machines ever ran actual Unix. Anyway, the SUN/1 board became the nucleus of a startup company that called itself "Sun". I believe Bill Joy came from being a Unix honcho at Berkeley to be a founder, as well. There was another project to build a high-performance 3D graphics subsystem; this was called IRIS, for "Integrated Raster Imaging System". It spun off into Silicon Graphics. -- -Stephen H. Westin Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors. Article 8086 of alt.sys.pdp10: Path: news3.best.com!news2.best.com!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!firehose.mindspring.com!news.mindspring.com!alderson From: alderson@netcom2.netcom.com (Richard M. Alderson III) Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp8,alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: ooh, a *real* flamewar :) Date: 12 Apr 2000 22:42:07 GMT Organization: NETCOM On-line services Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <8ce1l9$3q7$1@news.enteract.com> <8cfkp5$fp0$1@new-news.cc.brandeis.edu> <8d289v$8s$1@agate.berkeley.edu> Reply-To: alderson@netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.66 X-Server-Date: 12 Apr 2000 22:41:43 GMT In-reply-to: westin*nospam@graphics.cornell.edu's message of 12 Apr 2000 13:09:01 -0400 Xref: news3.best.com alt.sys.pdp8:5260 alt.sys.pdp10:8086 alt.folklore.computers:155002 In article westin*nospam@graphics.cornell.edu (Stephen H. Westin) writes: > korpela@islay.ssl.berkeley.edu (Eric J. Korpela) writes: >> Did Sun have 68000-based machines? > There were SUN machines before there was a company called Sun. SUN > stands for "Stanford University Network". As I understand it, there > was a major effort to build lots of 68000-based workstations with > bitmap displays, connected by a campus-wide Ethernet (which had just > been souped up from 2MB/sec to 10MB/sec). This was all fit into a > MULTIBUS backplane. There were a couple of manufacturers of the SUN/1 > processor board, which included some quantity of on-board memory. I > don't know if these machines ever ran actual Unix. The SUN processor project predated 10Mbit Ethernet by quite some time; we were still installing 10Mb when I got to Stanford in 1984, and there was a *lot* of "yellow peril" 3Mb cable under the machine room floor at LOTS. The SUN processor was intended to be the CPU for a "3M" machine (1MIPS, 1MB of memory, and 1 million pixels on the display screen). It was used by several Stanford-derived startups, such as Sun and 'cisco Systems (oldest spelling). Rich Alderson Last LOTS Tops-20 Systems Programmer, 1984-1991 Current maintainer, MIT TECO EMACS (v. 170) Customer Advocacy, XKL LLC, 1993-2000 last name @ XKL dot COM Chief systems administrator, XKL LLC, 1998-now Article 8092 of alt.sys.pdp10: Path: news3.best.com!news2.best.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!europa.netcrusader.net!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!denver-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!namche.sun.com!ebaynews1.EBay.Sun.COM!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!engnews1.eng.sun.com!engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM!not-for-mail From: Deborah Gronke Bennett Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp8,alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: ooh, a *real* flamewar :) Date: 12 Apr 2000 18:37:33 -0700 Organization: Sun Microsystems, Microelectronics Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <8ce1l9$3q7$1@news.enteract.com> <8cfkp5$fp0$1@new-news.cc.brandeis.edu> <8d289v$8s$1@agate.berkeley.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: mayfield.eng.sun.com X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 Xref: news3.best.com alt.sys.pdp8:5262 alt.sys.pdp10:8092 alt.folklore.computers:155011 korpela@islay.ssl.berkeley.edu (Eric J. Korpela) writes: > In article , > Eric Smith wrote: > >I'm not aware of how Sun solved this problem on their 68000-based machines; > > Did Sun have 68000-based machines? I thought that the first Sun I used > (one of those old ugly Sun 1 systems (weren't they actually called the > Sun 100 at the time?)) was 68010 based. It certainly had /bin/mc68010 linked > to /bin/true. > The Sun 100U had a Sun-2 (68010) CPU. The actual Sun-1 machines had 68000 CPU cards. I found a not-too-bad hardware history at this URL: http://www.ludd.luth.se/~bear/project/sun/sun.hardware.txt